[CDATA[> Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. I am faced with the same situation right now. Individuals often make decisions based on what they believe to be the historical purposes and goals of an institution. It is difficult to predict the outcome of the manuscript at this stage, but you can be hopeful. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. Performance & security by Cloudflare. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. If so, how close was it? Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent . resubmitnoveltyappeal, Resubmitpoint-by-pointresponse letterresubmitresponse letterresubmitresponse letternature, Proofreadingresubmit, Proofreadinglicence to publish, NatureNatureNature, wileynature science, Nature CommunicationsNatureNature CommunicationsPeer-review, Nature Communicationstransparent peer-reviewgetNature Communicationsget50%Nature Communicaitons, sciencenature. However, the final decision may not be only that of an acceptance or a rejection. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? 2. ]]> Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. or help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. I am at the same stage. And hope you hear from the journal soon! Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. b. I regret giving them his address. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in You don't need to, and shouldn't, make a rash decision. The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. If authors wish to contest an editorial decision, we ask them to submit a form that organizes their arguments into categories that we find useful in reviewing our original judgments. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. The categories includeroughly in order of persuasivenessnew data or analysis, factual errors by referees or editors, disagreement with technical criticisms, evidence of referee bias, procedural concerns and disputes over novelty or significance. best firewood for allergies; shannon balenciaga jail; river lathkill postcode And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. ii a. I gave them his address. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Did you find it helpful? Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxx" has now been seen again by our original reviewers, whose comments are appended below. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . Of these, about 100 came in as presubmission enquiries by e-mail (for which our median decision turnaround time is 3 days). Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. [CDATA[> Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. Nature has space to publish only 8% or so of the 200 papers submitted each week, hence its selection criteria are rigorous. . Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. 2002 Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) makes the final decision on manuscript, with the associate editor (AE) making the initial decision. !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . Hope that helps. Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Click to reveal Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. This will reduce delays. So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. Things just always take much longer than we think they would. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. Nat Neurosci 5, 917 (2002). The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. AE stands for Associate Editor. Need help with your experiments? Either rejection or sending it out for review. In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. The finals started yesterday. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. [CDATA[// >